While I appreciate that Robert Windrem and Ben Popken shared their knowledge that official Russian outlets supported Tulsi Gabbard in February, I called it a few months before guys. And guess what, guys, it’s more than just the official outlets, and it’s also Venezuela.
Month: March 2019
Algorithms, Authenticity, and Coordinated, Inauthentic Behavior: A Case Study in Caitlin Johnstone
A lot of conversations are going on online about the nature of censorship, social media, democracy and technology and yet not one of the commentaries made by people who’ve claimed victimization or decried others that I’ve read thus far has demonstrated adequate subject area knowledge about what’s been going on.
This article will review three concepts important to discussions about social media in relationship to algorithms, authenticity, and coordinated, inauthentic behavior; using Caitlin Johnstone’s Medium and Facebook account as a brief case study.
As of March 5th 2019, there are 394 million responses to the Google Query of “Facebook Algorithm”. And yet Abby Martin, Jimmy Dore, Lee Camp, Aaron Mate, Branko Marcetic, Chris Hedges – anyone that’s been contracted to work for Venezuelan and Russian state media outlets really – have a real hard time understanding what it is.
In the simplest terms as it applies to this case, algorithms a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations; they quantify lots of data according to specific terms for use of some sort. PCTR, or Interest, Post, Creator, Type, and Recency are just five of the myriad factors which fit into such problem-solving processes for
Given her claim that she is just a “rogue journalist” without any kind of institutional affiliation or disclosure of support from states such as Russia and Venezuela, it’s surprising that Caitlin Johnstone also has trouble understanding this.
Caitlin Johnstone’s journalism has lead to controversies in Arc Digital, Counterpoint, Mint Press News, Daily Kos, and other outlets. Sometimes described as a Cassandra Fairbanks-like content creator, a former TeleSUR contractor, I honestly haven’t read much Caitlin Johnstone. Like a TeleSUR contractor and Jacobin author Branko Marcetic, she is an Australian without demonstrable specialized subject area knowledge in the subjects she writes about – I’ll give her that the wacky-tacky Doomsday Prepper poetess schtick does provide some decent turns of phrase in what I did read, but as numerous others have stated the editorial standards are very low. .
While I haven’t read anything since last she popped up on my radar in connection to Orwellian Irony, an alert I have for a certain set of search terms came to my inbox and so I again found myself on her Medium page. One there I saw echoed the commentary framed in almost exactly the same way that I encountered in my research on TeleSUR, slightly different opinions but similarly based on significant omissions and distortions.
Shortly before my Medium account was taken down due to the coordinated activity of a group of Trans activists known as ACTUP, I posted a comment on this article that Caitlin Johnstone had published about Venezuela just a few minutes before. As she’d responded to the person who wrote two minutes before, I asked her a question.
Not only did I not get a response from the author, but I then watched in real time as a stream of comments that started to fill the response board and that lots of claps were being given to low-quality comments. My thoughtful request comment was literally drowned out by comments that looked suspicious. I decided to take a peak, and sure enough – they were! After looking at several of the accounts that had posted comments – it was clear that there were a number of sock puppet accounts heaping praise in the form of claps and engagement in the form of low-quality comments on the blog.
Like Darrel, the entirety of Joe Blow’s comments exist solely on the comments section of Caitlin Johnstone’s Medium page.
Like Darrel, these comments are small quotes, trite praises for “telling the truth” or comments only tangentially connected to the topic. It’s filler.
Unlike Darrel,
Unlike Darrel, Joe Blow may have a verifiable connection to a known disinformation account.
Why I decided to include two accounts that only commented on Caitlin Johnstone was to hint at
To be clear, I’m not saying that these Jow Blows are the same people – I’m just saying that given the lack of creativity of Venezuelan and Russian coordinated inauthentic networks it’s very, very likely that they are.
When Social Media platforms and Google respond to such coordinated inauthentic behaviors by penalizing those that have brazenly broken their terms and conditions, as it would seem that Caitlin Johnstone has done in this instance, it is not to silence speech – but to make the marketplace of ideas more democratic by having one’s numbers being honest and authentic.
Glossary of Technology Terms
TECHNOLOGICAL GLOSSARY
Technology development: Development of products, processes, equipment and operating methods. It includes research and pilot processes.
Sustainable development and social responsibility: The production of the present must not affect the production of the future, seeking to rehabilitate, preserve and conserve renewable resources and the quality of the environment. It implies taking responsibility for the impact. Its objective is to prevent and mitigate the environmental impact that productive activities may cause on the natural heritage and the quality of life.
Technological development: Set of activities through which seeks to improve or generate new processes or products in the production or administration of the company. It includes one or more forms of research (basic, applied, experimental), but also refers to activities such as adapting technology, solving technical problems and standardization (analysis, inspection and testing of raw materials and inputs, machines and products) ).
Technological unemployment: It is understood as a probable consequence of the application of new technologies or of the substitution of some process by another one that is more intensive in the use of capital.
Technological diagnosis: It consists of systematizing and analyzing the pertinent data of information and technological intelligence; qualify, in relation to quality and productivity, the level of technological modernity of the company in relation to competitors; qualify the potential of own technological development and by technology acquisitions, with reference to the tendencies indicated by the technological prospective; identify bottlenecks related to technology that prevent the company from moving towards higher levels of quality in processes and products; identify specific lines of research and development and technological innovation to increase the capacity for competition in general and for the improvement of quality, in particular.
Diffusion: Process of propagation of a technical innovation among potential users (adoption of a new technique), its continuous improvement and adaptation.
Dimension: One of the criteria under which a certain indicator can be analyzed within an organization.
Effectiveness: Systematic generation of consistent results integrating effectiveness and efficiency. Customer satisfaction is achieved with the optimal use of resources.
Efficiency: Contribution of the obtained results to the fulfillment of global objectives (of the society); relevance, relevance, validity or socioeconomic utility of the results (predefined objectives).
Efficiency: Measures the amount of resources used to achieve the proposed objective, that is, it relates the degree of use of the resources of the production process.
Link between basic and applied research. The presence of efficient connectors that link the results of laboratory research with industrial practice. The realization of industrial scaling for new products. Participation in this process of highly qualified personnel (PhD level), interaction with research centers and universities.
Entity: Any important thing within the organization that deserves to be embodied in a data model.
Support entities: The existence of entities for the development of innovation, through the provision of advice and funding such as: Institute for the promotion of Innovation, INNOVAR, TECNOS, CORPODIB. Technological centers for research such as CORPOICA; CENICAFE, this project that presents the current situation of innovation and gives guidelines for improvement.
Strategy: Mode of relating to the environment; form (ways, modalities) of reaching the proposed objectives. In the strategies, the philosophy of the company is specified. The strategies express the way in which the company hopes to sustain itself or increase its participation in the market. The strategies can be of a financial nature, focus on marketing and marketing or be oriented to technological development. The strategies also show the aspirations of the company, regarding the positioning in its productive sector and the capacity to generate greater added value.
Organizational structure: The organizational structure is the way to group human and material resources, defining the role of each unit, in the sense of making its administration more viable and achieving the objectives of the organization. When technological development becomes an important strategy, the challenge is to make it a systematic and permanent activity. For this, it is necessary to adapt the organization and structure of the firm, defining the functions, responsibilities and means.
Technological evaluation: Process of systematic analysis, prediction and assessment of a wide range of impacts on society, the environment and the economy, related to selection and technological change, in order to identify public policy, investment and production options . Evaluation of the social, environmental and economic costs of existing technologies, of the form of environmental pollution, social disturbances, infrastructure costs, etc., anticipation of probable harmful effects of new technologies; design methods to minimize these costs and evaluation of the possible benefits of the introduction of new or alternative technologies in terms of social, environmental and economic needs. The technological evaluation has tended to be translated, however, into a relevance analysis and cost-benefit calculations. The evaluation of technological alternatives is an internal process of the company, consisting of the identification of technological offers, national and international, in the individual valuation of said offers and in the determination of their impacts, based on the knowledge and experience of the company.
Evaluation: Process oriented to decision making and action, which seeks to determine the relevance, effectiveness and impact of the use of resources, activities and results based on pre-established objectives. The evaluation, which can be “exante” or “expost”, constitutes a dynamic, technical, systematic, rigorous, transparent, open and participatory process, supported by data, sources, information and diverse agents and explicitly incorporated in the process of taking decisions. The evaluation unit (evaluator) must be independent of the political authorities and executors involved, and have credibility and autonomy. Currently, multi-criteria evaluation methods are used in a wide variety of problems, including the evaluation of projects.
Critical success factor: Those areas where satisfactory performance is essential in order for a business to be successful; characteristics, conditions or variables that have a direct influence on customer satisfaction in a specific business process; the group of activities that must be carried out correctly if a vision is to be achieved.
Environmental management: Activity oriented to the application of modern management principles and techniques to the process of sustainable production, seeking to establish alternatives for the use of natural resources that are economically, ecologically and socially sustainable. Its objective is to incorporate environmental considerations in the planning processes and in the definition of development programs and projects.
Quality management: proactive management of productive, administrative and commercial resources to ensure the achievement of the global objectives defined in the plans and development strategies of the organization When the company is organized to perform with quality products and each of the operations productive and administrative, it is possible to achieve significant changes through a series of innovations that use quality control. The organization for continuous improvement favors creativity and constitutes a very important input to achieve mastery of productive and administrative technologies.
Information management: The company must document its technological development activities so that the institutional memory is kept up-to-date, the collective use of knowledge is facilitated, mistakes are not repeated and efficiency is achieved in the actions. Business information today must be conceived as a source of knowledge and decision, not only of registration. The information at managerial level must be designed to generate knowledge and this to allow opportunity of action that at the same time generates innovation.
Management of technological innovation: It is the process aimed at organizing and directing the available resources, both human and technical and economic, with the aim of increasing the creation of new knowledge, generating ideas that allow obtaining new products, processes and services or improving existing, and transfer those same ideas to the manufacturing and marketing phases.
Personnel management: Innovative companies must have an excellent management of human resources, therefore it is a fundamental variable for business success nowadays. The management of creative human teams must take into account the following aspects: motivate creativity, give spaces to generate ideas, accept and practice suggestions given by workers, select people with innovative capacity and interdisciplinarity. The transformation of companies must be advanced through human resources, implementing a model focused on leadership and the improvement of various aspects of the company and people. Through the human factor companies improve their operational efficiency and achieve high performance teams. These elements produce efficient and flexible organizations oriented to the client and obtain better results.
Technology management: The process by which companies manage their technological resources, understood in terms of hard technologies incorporated in machinery and soft technologies semicorporated in advisory or training courses, or disincorporated in the form of manuals, books, plans, patents, among others.
Management of the human factor: The way in which the human factor intervenes and manages innovation. It consists of four elements: The training of staff constantly. The promotion of teamwork. The integration of the personnel and the creation and application of strategic personnel groups (mixture of professionals with people from the base of the organizational charts). The development of creativity in all the staff.
Human Resource Management: Way to manage human resources, motivating them towards continuous improvement. The elements that constitute it are: 1) Training and ongoing training; 2) Stimulus to creativity; 3) Motivation; 4) Leadership and 5) Teamwork.
Technological management: Application of management techniques in support of technological innovation processes. The ability of the company to make knowledge and information productive. As a branch of industrial engineering, technological management is defined as the set of activities and business decisions related to the technological variable, within a holistic and systemic vision of the organization, in order to be competitive in the global market. Technological management is an interdisciplinary field in which knowledge of engineering, science and administration is mixed in order to carry out the planning, development and implementation of technological solutions that contribute to the achievement of the strategic and tactical objectives of an organization. In technological management, technological needs and opportunities are identified, and technological solutions are planned, designed, developed and implemented; it constitutes a process of administration of technological research activities and the transfer of its results to the productive units.
Enabler: Practices, processes or methods that facilitate the implementation of a best practice and allow satisfying a critical factor of success, help explain why the performance indicated by a benchmark.
Management indicator: It is a measure of the condition of a process or event at a given moment; is a relationship between quantitative or qualitative variables, which allows observing the situation and trends of change generated with the object or phenomenon observed, with respect to objectives and expected goals and expected influences. The indicators can be values, units, indexes, statistical series and, together, they can provide an overview of the situation of a process, a business or the general state of a company. By using them in a timely and up-to-date manner, the indicators allow for adequate control over a given situation; The main reason for its importance is that it is possible to predict and act based on the positive or negative trends observed in overall performance.
Adaptation of technology: Process during which foreign technologies are modified in order to accommodate them to local conditions in terms of market size, raw materials and consumer needs, among others.
Total quality management: It refers to the establishment of policies, objectives, annual plans, strategies and quality activities, which lead to comprehensive quality through the participation of everyone in the company. It also includes the formalization of quality in the company through structures, responsibilities, standards, procedures, methods, tools and techniques determined to achieve it. It contains all the required documentation including national and international standards that govern the product and process.
Acquisition of technology not incorporated in goods: In the form of patents, licenses, know-how, brands, projects, models and services with technological content.
Acquisition of technology: Selection of the technological inputs that are more attractive to acquire than to develop. Includes selection, negotiation and transfer.
Assimilation of technology: It is when the person or company that acquires it is able to exercise total control over it, understanding as such the full application to the productive activities in which it is used, its possible reproduction, adaptation and improvement, application to new situations within the company and distribution of it to third parties.
Technological audit: Follow-up to the technology that was acquired, adapted or developed to establish its goodness and real use.
Benchmark: Measuring best-in-class achievement, benchmark or standard measure to be compared, this novel is recognized as the standard of excellence for a specific business process.
Generic Benchmarking: Benchmarking process that compares a function function of a particular company or process with two or more independent companies in your industry.
Internal benchmarking: The comparison process carried out within an organization between similar units or business processes.
Benchmarking: An organizational improvement tool based on the evaluation and continuous analysis of practices; processes; policies and strategies recognized in the market as successful; for its subsequent adaptation and assimilation in an organization.
Biotechnology: Use and manipulation of biological processes using microbial agents, plant or animal cells or their derivatives to generate or modify products and processes, improve plants or animals and develop microorganisms for their application in agricultural activities, health, food production; project and selection of equipment such as enzymatic reactors, etc.
Data Warehouse: See Data Warehouse.
Productive chain: The productive chains are the continuous and discontinuous flows of products, processes and aggregation of values, which follow the primary products until reaching the final consumer.
Technical change: In a broad sense, it is an advance, a change in technique (production method) or the adoption of a different technique. Technical change refers to obtaining a specific product with a different amount or proportion of inputs (labor and capital), that is, a zero displacement along the production function; the qualitative improvement of existing products or processes or the introduction of new processes or products. A technical change occurs through innovation and, to some extent, diffusion. Changes in technique do not necessarily imply new technology; they may simply consist of imitation and diffusion of existing techniques or substitution of factors. Play an important role in models of economic growth; However, there is some controversy regarding the extent to which it is an exogenous factor in economic growth. Sometimes it is confused with the terms technological change and technical progress.
Technological change: It is an advance in technology, an increase in technical knowledge or in the available set of techniques; a change in technology itself, in a strict sense. It is a change within the technical relations of production. Technological change is a process closely related to technological research, invention, innovation and diffusion. Technological change can be defined as the process through which societies acquire and put into practice new and better ways of producing new and better goods and services. It is a social process that presents a complex cause-and-effect relationship with cultural transformations. It also influences the structures, mentalities and values of society; which, in turn, condition technological innovations. There are several motivations that lead a company to value technological change, some of an endogenous nature and others of an exogenous nature.
Cycle P.H.V.A. (Plan, Do, Check, Act). The P.H.V.A. is a managerial conception that dynamizes the relationship between man and processes and seeks to control them based on the establishment, maintenance and improvement of standards, a task that is advanced through the definition of project specifications (quality standards), technical specifications of process and operating procedures. This cycle effectively helps to adopt and monitor the processes of a company, as long as it is constituted in an endless procedure, that is to say, that is planned, an action is taken, it is verified if the results were the expected and acted about these results to restart the cycle.
Competitiveness: In general terms, competitiveness refers to the capacity of an entity (organization, region or country) to create added value and increase its wealth by managing assets and processes, enhancing local and regional factors based on its internationalization within of a project of economic and social development. Competitiveness is the ability of a company, sector, region or country to maintain, grow or expand or diversify in a market. The competitiveness of the biotechnology sector food and beverages is a measure of the ability of economic agents (producers, industrialists and traders) to design, produce and sell goods whose attributes in terms of prices, environmental sustainability and satisfaction of needs and demands are combined to form a more attractive package than that of similar products offered by competitors, taking into account that the final judge is the national and international market. What is important for competitiveness (and productivity) is not the amount of technological research, but the ability to frame technological developments (innovations, technical progress), within a company strategy.
Conceptualization of technological innovation. It consists of the way in which technological innovation is interpreted within the sector. It consists of three elements: The interpretation of innovation as a process that seeks to introduce new products, processes or internal improvements into the market. The interpretation of innovation as a process of technology transfer. The interpretation of innovation as research and development activities that do not need to be commercialized.
Ad hoc query: It is a query that can not be easily satisfied by means of a data model previously constructed.
Technical assistance contract: It is the set of activities dedicated to advising and training a certain entity in the solution of its technical problems during a certain period of time.
License Agreement: Is the permission granted by the grantor or provider of the technology to another person or company to exploit a patent, a registered trademark, an industrial model or drawing and a secret process during a determined period.
Patent contract: It is the exclusive right, granted under the Law, for the exploitation of a technical innovation and that excludes other parties from the production, sale, import and use of the product that is the subject of the patent. It is a form of industrial property.
Management control: The management control is a managerial, integral and strategic instrument that, supported by indicators, indexes and tables produced in a systematic, periodic and objective way, allows the organization to be effective to attract resources, efficient to transform them and effective for channel them. Management control is a system of statistical, financial, administrative and operational information that, placed at the service of the organization’s management, allows it to take correct or timely decisions, adopt corrective measures that correspond and control the evolution over time of the main variables and processes.
Creation of technology: It is the search for original solutions to existing problems that require a technological solution, whether applied to processes in machinery and equipment or in people in the form of knowledge or training.
Creativity of professionals. The techniques and mechanisms used to encourage and develop the creativity of the people directly involved with the innovation process, especially professionals. The sector’s concern for encouraging creativity.
Business culture: Incorporated in the principles, behaviors, norms, beliefs and values that constitute the expression of the business philosophy. It defines the way of thinking of the company, the way of acting.
Organizational culture: The culture is specific to each organization, including the values, beliefs and behaviors that are consolidated and shared during the business life. The leadership style at the level of senior management, the rules, procedures and general characteristics of the members of the company complete the combination of elements that make up the culture of a company. Organizational culture is the way of “thinking”, “feeling” and “acting” of organizations. It must be developed around effectiveness, whose main element is the self-learning that is achieved through the search for what influences the behavior of people, inquiring about what motivates and “moves” to do.
Data Mart: Data Warehouse limited in scope and / or approach.
Data Warehouse Global: Data Warehouse that covers the information needs
of the organization as a whole.
Data Warehouse: A copy of transactional data specifically structured for queries and analysis, which is Oriented towards topics, with Integrated information, which supports variations over time and whose information is not volatile.
DBMS: Abbreviation for Database Management System.
Technological disaggregation: It is the breakdown of each of the components of a technological package for the production and distribution of a good or a service. It seeks to disaggregate spinal and peripheral technology in order to improve the negotiating position of the acquirer, reduce the cost and volume of acquisition, generate demand for local goods and services and stimulate the dissemination and assimilation of technology.
Process technology: Refers to the conditions, procedures and forms of organization necessary to combine inputs, human resources and capital goods in an appropriate manner to produce a good or a service. It usually has to do with process manuals, plant manuals, performance calculations, material and energy balances, distribution of equipment, etc.
Product technology: It is the part of the technological package related to the standards, specifications and general quality and presentation requirements that a good or a service must fulfill. If you want to create a package where the product technology is predominant, you should have information regarding the description and drawings of the product, the manuals of use, application and maintenance of the same, the formulas and compositions, the specifications of raw materials, assembly instructions, tolerance, etc., as well as industrial property issues such as patents and trademarks.
Cutting-edge technology: It is the most modern of all. It usually requires a high capital investment for its acquisition and few companies own it.
Disincorporated technology: It is one whose knowledge has been extracted from people or objects.
Dynamic technology: That which has a high development through the time of validity of the technology.
Hard technology: The part of knowledge that refers to equipment, products, facilities, processes and materials developed by an organization. Hard technology refers to the mechanical aspects or hardware. It refers to the automatic and systematic, in this the risk is zero because it does not involve the emotional part of the people; It contemplates everything that is protocolized and is rigid.
Emerging technology: It is one that is appearing in the economic and industrial field and is being used by some companies.
Static technology: Represents low level of development through the time of validity of the technology.
Embedded technology: These are technologies that are neither modern nor primitive.
Acquisition of Technology Incorporated into Capital: those situations in which concepts, ideas and methods are incorporated into the firm through the purchase of new capital goods and productive inputs, in which case the acquisition of Technology “incorporated into capital will be discussed.
Acquisition of Technology not incorporated into Capital: those circumstances in which such incorporation is the result of a research activity carried out either routinely or not outside the firm or at the request of the latter, in which case we will be referring to the acquisition of technology “disincorporated or not incorporated into capital”.
Free technology: Public domain technology, which can be accessed without restrictions. Knowledge is available in full.
Core technology: A set of knowledge that are essential, inherent, specific, specific to a project, service, product or administrative technique. Such knowledge characterizes the corresponding activity by way of its basic properties and requirements.
Modern technology: It is the one produced in the last decades. It is not the most advanced.
Obsolete technology: It is the one that has been completely surpassed by another more recent one because the new technology needs less capital, less work or less of the two factors to produce the same.
Peripheral technology: Set of knowledge that are specific to a process, product or service and that are necessary for the use of core technologies; It is related to all knowledge that is not the exclusive domain of a branch of the production of goods or services, but with those that can be applied to many different activities.
Primitive technology: It is one that has been used since ancient times, requires little capital and a lot of manpower. It does not produce large profits, therefore it does not develop the specialization of the workers, nor a rapid growth of capital.
Secret technology: It is one whose knowledge is protected. It is very difficult to have access to it or its cost is very high.
Technology: In its most general meaning, it is the set of ways and ways of doing things or the set of systematized knowledge for the production of a good or a service. Often it is scientific knowledge but also knowledge organized in another way, applied systematically to the production and distribution of goods and services. Technology is the set of knowledge and methods for the design, production and distribution of goods and services, including those incorporated into the means of work, labor, processes, services and organization. Technology is driven by need, by satisfying the needs of society, the economy and business. There is a practice of privatization and restricted access to technological knowledge. Technology is a system of technical knowledge, systematic knowledge of practical or industrial arts; It consists of a series of empirical techniques, traditional knowledge, craftsmanship, skills, skills, procedures and experiences that are not based on science. Technology reflects and is determined both by the technical relations of production and by the social relations of production (it is not neutral), within a given social formation; it constitutes a concrete response to specific social economic conditions.
Trend towards quality: The clarity in the objectives of the innovation, oriented towards the search of the quality of the products and the continuous improvement within the company.
Technology transfer: Technology transmission process (technical knowledge) and its assimilation, adaptation, diffusion and reproduction by a productive device different from the one that generated it. The appropriation of technology includes knowing its nature (process, product, tacit), the effectiveness of legal protection mechanisms (patents, copyright, trademarks, trade secrets, intellectual property) and complementary capabilities (marketing, quality control and support). On sales). The transfer of technology has the following modalities: sale or purchase of machinery and equipment, licensing agreements through which the use of legally owned technology is authorized, Know-How agreements when there are no patents, technical assistance, training, contracts for administration and marketing, research and development services, consulting services, engineering services, “turnkey” contracts, etc. The transfer of technology requires the issuance of a technology contract, an agreement by means of which a transferor discloses to a concessionaire the technology to execute an operation and / or license for the use of technical knowledge. Among the basic characteristics for the transfer of technology are: the degree of complexity, level of maturity, investment, characteristics compared with new technologies and replace, the economic environment, the scientific and technological environment of the country, the company is innovative, information on innovations, benefits expected by the user and the provider, costs, knowledge and legislation, among others.
Internal transfer of technology: It occurs between companies of the same type, by a producer of capital goods or raw materials, by a technical research or information center.
Real technology transfer: It occurs when the technology acquired is received by the country’s scientific and technological structure or by companies that carry out processes of disaggregation, assimilation and adaptation of these to local needs.
Transplantation of technology: Process by which acquired technologies are used without carrying out processes of disaggregation, assimilation or adaptation in them.
Vision: Provides the frame of reference of what the company wants and expects to see in the future. The corporate vision points the way that allows top management to establish the course to achieve the expected development of the organization in the future. It must have dimensions in time, be broad, inclusive, understood by the members of the entire organization, realistic and possible.
Clarifying Concepts: Cultural Marxism vs. CastroChavismo
Differences between #CulturalMarxism and #CastroChavismo:
1. Names of people within the narrative.
2. Places the events occurred.
3. The organizations and agencies involved.
4. The fact that the time period is different.
5. The fact that CastroChavismo has testimonials of involvement and activity.
6. The fact that CastroChavismo has material evidence.
7. The fact that CastroChavismo uses Data Science.
8. The fact that CastroChavismo analyzes Primary Documents.
9. The fact that CastroChavismo can be live updated, commented upon, and responded to via Knowledge Management practices.
10. The fact that the CastroChavismo elicits a significantly different conversation about Democracy than the other one given the role of social media
Avowal of the National Council of Public Historians Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
The NCPH Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct were adopted in 2007 to replace a version from 1986, this code sets forth guidelines of professional conduct expected of all members of the NCPH.
This Code of Ethics sets forth guidelines of professional conduct expected of all members of the National Council on Public History. Recognizing that public historians practice in a variety of specialized professional fields, this code incorporates reference to other codes and guidelines as appropriate. The purpose of this code is to articulate expectations of conscientious practice, not to set thresholds for certification, investigation, or adjudication. The National Council on Public History promotes ongoing discussion of ethics and professional conduct in classrooms, conferences, workshops, and professional literature as a best practice of the profession as a whole.
The Public Historians’ Responsibility to the Public
This code recognizes that the public may be defined in multiple and sometimes competing ways and that public interest is a fluid concept often formulated within the context of particular situations and subject to continuous debate. Nonetheless, ethical practice implies a responsibility to serve the public interest, as conscientiously determined in any given situation, and requires certain basic principles of professional conduct.
1. Public historians should serve as advocates for the preservation, care, and accessibility of historical records and resources of all kinds, including intangible cultural resources.
2. Public historians should carry out historical research and present historical evidence with integrity.
3. Public historians should strive to be culturally inclusive in the practice of history and in the presentation of history.
4. Public historians should be fully cognizant of the purpose or purposes for which their work is intended, recognizing that research-based decisions and actions may have long-term consequences.
5. Public historians should maintain a conscious regard for the interpersonal dynamics inherent in historical practice.
THE PUBLIC HISTORIANS’ RESPONSIBILITY TO CLIENTS AND EMPLOYERS
Public historians have a responsibility to perform work competently, diligently, creatively, and independently in pursuit of a client’s or employer’s interest, and a corollary responsibility to assure that such performance is consistent with their service to the public interest.
1. A public historian should respect the decisions of a client or employer concerning the objectives and nature of the professional services to be performed unless such performance involves conduct which is illegal, immoral, or unethical.
2. A public historian should maintain exclusive supervision over historical research studies and investigations.
3. A public historian should exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of a client and employer.
4. A public historian should not solicit prospective clients or employment through the use of false or misleading claims, harassment, or duress.
5. A public historian should not offer professional services by stating or implying an ability to influence decisions by improper means.
6. A public historian should not accept or continue to perform work that is beyond his or her professional competence.
7. A public historian should not perform work if there is an actual, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable conflict of interest, or an appearance of impropriety, without full written disclosure to the affected client/s or employer/s.
8. A public historian is obligated not to disclose information gained in a professional relationship when the client or employer has requested such information to be held confidential. Exceptions to the principle of non-disclosure must be made when required by process of law. Exceptions may be made when disclosure would prevent a violation of law or prevent a substantial injustice to the public interest. In such instances, a public historian must verify the facts and issues of the circumstance and, when practicable, make every reasonable effort to obtain separate opinions from other qualified professionals employed by the client or employer and every reasonable effort to obtain reconsideration from the client or employer.
9. A public historian should not use the power of any office or professional relationship to seek or obtain a special advantage that is not in the public interest.
THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN’S RESPONSIBILITY TO THE PROFESSION AND TO COLLEAGUES
Public historians should contribute to the development of the historical profession by advancing knowledge and improving methods, systems, procedures, and technical applications. More broadly, public historians should respect the professional views of their colleagues and peers in all professional fields. Public historians should strive to increase the diversity of the profession to reflect more closely the demographics of society. Equally important, public historians should strive to increase public understanding of the practice of public history.
1. A public historian should accurately represent the qualifications, views, and findings of colleagues.
2. A public historian should have a working knowledge of the methods, principles, and standards pertinent to specialized practice fields as appropriate to projects undertaken for clients or employers. A public historian also should be familiar with the broadly applicable Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct adopted by the American Historical Association.
3. A public historian should approach each research problem as unique, examine the applicability of research theories and methods to the facts and analysis of each particular situation, and use methods appropriate for each situation.
4. A public historian also should analyze each research problem within an appropriate body of scholarship drawn from all pertinent disciplines.
5. A public historian should share the results of experience and research that contribute to the body of public historical knowledge.
6. A public historian who reviews the work of other professionals should do so in a fair, considerate, and respectful manner.
7. A public historian should contribute time and information to the professional development of students, interns, beginning professionals, and other colleagues.
8. A public historian should welcome opportunities to represent cultural diversity in his or her work and to enfold members of underrepresented groups into the profession.
THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN’S SELF-RESPONSIBILITY
High standards of professional integrity, knowledge, and proficiency are the hallmarks of excellence in public history.
1. A public historian should represent professional qualifications and education accurately and fully.
2. A public historian should incorporate continuing education into his or her professional development.
3. A public historian should respect the rights of others.
4. A public historian should not discriminate against others.
5. A public historian should not deliberately commit a wrongful act which adversely affects his or her professional fitness.
6. A public historian should critically examine personal issues of social conscience as distinct from issues of ethical practice.
The Movement of Movements Thesis, Invisibility Mapping and the Connection Between Venezuela and Antifa
This article will introduce the American Public to some of the finer points of Left-Wing Social theory and will introduce the American Public to a political party that’s worked inside America without any fanfare for over a decade, the United Socialist Party of America, or PSUA for short.
The Movements of Movements thesis attests to its likely existence; while Invisibility Mapping helps proves it. Using Antifa, a group that the United States Congress has sought to unmask, as a case study in invisibility mapping I will illustrate the connection between them, the PSUA and Venezuela.
Building the Base, with a Regional Focus
In future publications, which you can learn about by following me here, I will show how the PSUA developed in large part due to the material and symbolic assistance of Venezuela via Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro; the media company of which they are the President on Record – TeleSUR; TeleSURs state partners in Nicaragua, Cuba, Iran, and Russia; TeleSURs political party partners across the world; Venezuela’s official political and cultural attaches in the United States and elsewhere; media colectivos and encuentros organized via Bolivarian Circulo members abroad and Bolivarian Collectivos in Venezuela; Academic colectivos organized through the Cuba-based Red de Intellectuals; identity-based activism groups targeted by Bolivarian-supported Communist Entryists; the development of novel software and digital services; and more.
Five Fingers, One Fist: The Movement of Movement Thesis
Hugo Chavez never hid his intentions to help export revolution across the American continent. Proof of this is evident in the new name adopted by Venezuela, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela; his interest in founding a new Socialist International; the behavior of TeleSUR – the face of Venezuela’s Intelligence Apparatus; as well as myriad Bolivarian Government documents.
Using Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci’s writing as a guide and the oil-income from the PSVSA (the state oil company of Venezuela) – which has now moved their offices to Russia – Hugo and later his successor Nicolas Maduro Moros flattered political and cultural actors while also paying for participation in their world-altering quest to gain control of Latin America. While unable to ever economically develop their own country in the manner promised by PSUV (the United Socialist Party of Venezuela – Nicolas Maduro’s party); the net effect of this concerted political influence effort in North America was the creation of a counter-hegemonic political force that operated within North America, but at the behest of Venezuela. The name for this movement of movements is called the PSUA, or United Socialist Party of America.
Invisibility Mapping: An Algorithmic-based Rationale for Evidence
Having learned from the Soviet Union’s attempt to influence American politics, the directors of Project PSUA – the name that I’ve given to Venezuela Intelligence’s influence campaign in America – decided not to limit their support to one or two parties, but instead gave material or symbolic support to many parties, movements and individuals. Akin to Chairman Mao’s Hundred Flowers Campaign, they drew together a motley-crew of grassroots activists to help form and direct the new movement for socialism in America.
Proving this is difficult, especially so as many of the people involved refuse to talk about it, but it’s not impossible. There are a variety of ways of doing this, which the University of Washington has done and that I have demonstrated elsewhere. One method, however, the is likely to be novel to many people is called Invisibility Mapping.
Invisibility Mapping is the term of an algorithmic concept that I picked up from one of my favorite TV series, Star Trek: Discovery. When facing an invisible enemy, the crew decides to activate the ships spore drive hundreds of times around its enemy in order to gather small bits of information so that it may calculate a means of circumventing these “security culture” defenses. By getting small bits of information from a large sample size – new data emerges. Let’s see how this works in action.
Invisibility Mapping, Antifa and Venezuela
Refuse Fascism is one of many front groups for the Revolutionary Communist Party. They are aligned with Venezuela through ideological affinities as well as via institutional connections such as the Alliance for Global Justice Alliance – the new iteration of the Nicaragua Network, as well as Hands Off Venezuela. While they are open about their desire to help bring about violent socialist revolution in the United States, they are quiet about the nature of their relationship to other groups such as Redneck Revolt; John Brown Gun Club and the Hampton Insitute and The Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Communist Party and the Workers World Party. All defend and justify the acts of Antifa, and yet none of the claim open membership.
I state this not to claim that Bob Avakian is mastermind and bank for all their activity. He’s not. Nicolas Maduro is. He is, to quote Killer Mike, “the man behind the man behind the man behind the throne.”
Invisibility Mapping: The Antifa Case Study
How to test this hypothesis? Well I decided to write Rose City Antifa in order to try to verify it.
I sent them an email stating who I am and what my interest was, but they were did not respond. Understandable. Answering my surveys it would quickly validate the movement of movements thesis – something that those involved don’t want.
Nevertheless, the communique and projected survey outlined below shows how it is that one is able to map the invisible.
I share it here now so that the concept is better understood by my readers.
The Below is a copy of an email that I sent the leader of Rose City Antifa.
RCA,
On Feb 18, 2019, at 2:09 AM, Rose City Antifa <fight_them_back@riseup.net> wrote:Hi,
No that is not feasible. This is a very silly line of questioning. I am
not going to waste of both of our time to go through and counter these
weird points and flimsy “evidence”. The right-wing loves a conspiracy
theory and this tendency is largely impervious to reason.
///
RCA
On 2019-02-15 18:25, Ariel Sheen wrote:RCA,
Thanks for your prompt and informative response!
Based on it, I think that I did a poor job of communicating what I was
looking to learn by contacting you. My bad.
First, let me clarify that I haven’t encountered any evidence that
would lead me to believe that you or your particular Antifa group is
receiving money or instructions from Venezuela and that I believe you
when you describe your fundraising and volunteer efforts.
The same can’t be said, however, for Latin American Antifacists; nor
for PODEMOS in Spain; nor anarchist groups in Pais Vasco; nor for
Philly Antifa; nor for a number of other American groups.
I’m glad I could make you laugh about being part of an
“international communist conspiracy” but considering the above;
the previous information I shared; that Maduro now claims that the
Trump administration is the KKK and the Lima group are Nazis; and how
in Mark Bray’s book Antifa he claims:
“The only long-term solution to the fascist menace is to undermine
its pillars of strength in society grounded not only in white
supremacy but also in ableism, heteronormativity, patriarchy,
nationalism, transphobia, class rule, and many others. This long-term
goal points to the tensions that exist in defining anti-fascism,
because at a certain point destroying fascism is really about
promoting a revolutionary socialist alternative (in my opinion one
that is antiauthoritarian and nonhierarchical) to a world of crisis,
poverty, famine, and war that breeds fascist reaction.”
I think it’s rational to make the connection between the Bolivarian
Revolution’s goals for a new world order and an American group that
wants a revolutionary socialist alternative which aligns with those
goals. Right?
To repeat – I have no basis to make any claim that you or your group
is anything other than an organic expression of activism emerging from
your interpretation of the present – which is why I’m reaching out
to you and not Philly Antifa.
That said, let me clarify what I’d really like to know:
I’d be interested to know, as a percent of total, which of your
“members” are also members of?
The Revolutionary Communist Party
The Party for Socialism and Liberation
Workers World Party
Democratic Socialists of America
Freedom Road Socialist Organization
And other Leftist Factions, like Revolutionary Abolutionism Movement
I’d be interested to know, as a percent of total, which of your
“members” have gone to:
United States Social Forums
Regional Social Forums
World Social Forums
People’s Movement Assemblies
Left Forum
Academic Marxist Conferences
Etc.
I’d be interested to know, as a percent of total, which of your
“members” are or were involved with:
Bolivarian Circles
Hands Off Venezuela
Refuse Fascism
The Poor People’s Campaign
Occupy Wall Street (or regional iteration)
Project South
South to South
The Praxis Project
Alliance for Global Justice
Union Del Barrio
Grassroots Global Justice
Jobs with Justice
Derechos para Todos
The People’s Freedom Caravan
Crimethinc
Critical Resistance (There is a Portland Chapter)
All of Us or None
Rural Organizing
Jobs with Justice
Nicaragua Network
Code Pink
Black Lives Matters
Revolutionary Student Coordinating Committee
And a few more along those lines I could throw it into a Google
Survery, which allows for anonymous responses, provided you agreed to
share such a line of questioning.
Is this something that seems more feasible?
The PSUA & Antifa: Venezuela’s Rear-Guard
As you can tell by the survey, which is based on research into Venezuela’s interaction with American political movements, parties, political actors and sympathizers – they’ve been able to help create and direct a vast network of American activists.
The evidence that they do this is in their literature – however those that participate refuse to share about their behavior as to do so would be to admit this networks’ existance as well as the existance of a political party – the PSUA – that they would rather keep secret.