CastroChavismo is not “Cultural Marxism”
Use of the term CastroChavismo is descriptive of the Socialist-Affiliated Transnational Advocacy Networks in the U.S. receiving support and funding for theactivitiesfrom socialist governments in Latin America (PSUV, PCC, PT); socialist parties in the EU (Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung); and transnational NGOs (Open Society Initiative).
The term explicitly alludes to descriptions of activities historically engaged in by the Cuban Communist Party categorized as subversion, while simultaneously differentiating it from narratives about “Cultural Marxism” that may or may not have antisemitic overtones.
People who say I’m being Deleuzional by defining it as a repetition that is also different would be correct.
CastroChavismo is a set of activities with goals that can be organized according to principles of Knowledge Management.
Individuals participating in the events and activities associated with CastroChavismo can be classified as antisemitic for two reasons.
(1) Functional support of the goals and organizations connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as others that have avowed their desire to destroy the state of Israel – the lone Jewish-majority state in the world, which is located in the historic Jewish Homeland – which has been documented by Timothy Pearce, by Tariq Ali, and can be shown at in the alliances of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro.
The claim that someone’s ethnic Jewish background, George Soros, who does not even practice Judaism and who Israel also seeks to expose, within the analytical framework of CastroChavismo does not make it antisemitic.
In fact, if we were to extend that same logic – given my own ethnic Jewish background – one could just as similarly claim that all those who deny the historical correctness of CastroChavismo are themselves, anti-Semites.
In fact, people who try and disqualify interlocutors because of this are using a long-established anti-semitic trope.
In fact, given the aforementioned political orientation of those involved with CastroChavismo networks and their use of antisemitic tropes – it’s appropriate to say that people who deny CastroChavismo are themselves antisemitic as their attempt to police speech acts supports those that seek the elimination of Israel.